|
|
Viewpoint-11 November 2008 |
Adrian Gibbs: More Academic Mensuration and Wrong Criteria |
Australian National University vice-chancellor Ian Chubb’s comments in the Higher Education Supplement (The Australian, 29 October 2008) will scarcely encourage any of those trying to make a career of research in Australia, but is of interest because he is presumably promoting ideas that he believes will appeal to the mandarins. "Concentrate research spending on proven performers" is his message. But then we learn that his proven performers are research institutions rather than research workers!
How does V-C Chubb identify such
"proven performers"? He recommends that we use the rankings devised by
The Times and by
How is it possible to embody the
value of a complex organisation, like a university, in a single
number? The shortcomings of such metrics are shown by the widely quoted
Citation Indices/Impact Factor rankings used to assess the quality of
individual academic contributions. What is the evidence that these
reflect the intellectual value of an author's contributions and not merely
the opinions of journal editors choosing articles that are fashionable and
promote journal sales?
____________________________________________
Professor Adrian Gibbs is a Fellow of the Australian Academy of Science. He retired from The Australian National University in 1999.