Fostering Success
at Community Colleges
In the Education Forum “Growing Roles for Science Education in community
colleges” (3 September 2010, p. 1151), G. R. Boggs proposes that
community college curriculums be revised to include science projects or
research-based experiences.
Most community college students are not prepared to undertake such
extracurricular research. In urban colleges, most students must work
full or part time, and many of them have involved personal lives. Few
would have the time or flexibility to take advantage of the kind of
programs Boggs proposes.
Since when has a lack of science research experience been an impediment
to community college students expecting to transfer to a 4-year college?
For that matter, when has their ultimate goal been to enroll in a 4-year
college? The goal of many community college students is to graduate with
an associate's degree that might qualify them for professional jobs
[often better compensated than those that require a bachelor's degree]
such as dental and medical assistants, computer specialists, and
engineering technicians.
What community college students do need is professional guidance to help
them survive academically as they contend with personal and financial
predicaments. Such support in community colleges is too often in short
supply. According to the National Survey of Counseling Center Directors
in 2009, 73% of directors describe their centers as primarily a mental
health/psychological center rather than primarily a career development
center. In colleges (including both 4-year and community programs),
there are approximately 1500 students per a single counselor.
Boggs makes but a single reference to improving “student support
services,” along with tutoring for unprepared students. Additional
funding for both, rather than the costly, hardly essential addition of
project and research programs, is what community colleges really need.
Igor V. Zaitsev
Science Department, Borough of Manhattan Community College, CUNY
|
Fostering Success
at Community Colleges—Response
Zaitsev Raises a valid argument for increasing student support services.
It is good to see faculty understanding of the obstacles that community
college students face. I certainly agree that more resources should be
devoted to student guidance, tutoring services, and financial aid, and I
strongly advocate for the importance of these programs. However, that
does not mean that attention should not also be placed on the quality of
the academic program. The Committee of Undergraduate Science Education
of the National Research Council states that “[i]nstitutions of higher
education should provide diverse opportunities for all undergraduates to
study science, mathematics, engineering, and technology as practiced by
scientists and engineers, and as early in their academic careers as
possible”. One way to accomplish this is to involve students in science
projects or research experiences. There are many examples of
undergraduate research projects at community colleges, including several
good examples of student research at Zaitsev's institution.
Student transfer to upper-division universities is an important goal for
many community college students. We need to continue to do what we can
to remove the obstacles to their success.
George R. Boggs
|