News & Views - May 2001
A New Canadian Venture, Blueprint Worldwide Inc., Plans to Create and Maintain a
Public Database of Information About the Proteins of Humans and Other Organisms.
(May 31, 2001)
The company is being formed by Canadian academics with financing from IBM, Toronto-based
life-sciences company MDS Inc. and by Canadian health authorities. IBM and MDS
are each contributing Ca$4.5 million (A$5.6 million) in financing, services and equipment.
Unlike leading for-profit firms it plans to give away its data. The company won't be generating the data itself, but will be
consolidating the public data scattered in various databases and publications. For example Blueprint plans to enter
results from some 200,000 scientific papers into the database. It also plans to develop new ways to
catalogue protein data, and will act as an international repository for the findings of all scientists.
David Lipman, who leads the National Institutes of Health division
that runs GenBank, one of the world's main repositories for genome data, said the U.S. government has no plans to launch a database of
protein interactions.
The two companies appear to be following a policy of
"enlightened self-interest." MDS is positioning itself to begin discovering new drugs, while
IBM is pursuing an emerging market among drug and biotech companies for computers and computer services.
This announcement follows on the February statement by
Canada's Minister for Industry, Brian Tobin, that Canada intends to become a world
leader in genomics. They appear to mean what they say.
Federation
of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies (FASTS) - "Budget
Fails the Modern Economy Test" (May 28, 2001)
"Dr David Denham, Vice-President of FASTS said the Government needed to take every opportunity to build upon the
measures it announced earlier this year in the innovation statement ...[But] the average spend in this area by the world's leading economies is just over
two percent of GDP, where Australia is currently spending about 1.5 per cent. It is measured by GERD (Gross
Expenditure on R&D) as a percentage of GDP (Gross Domestic Product).
'To reach this target, the Federal Government would have to make an announcement of the
size of Backing Australia's Ability ($2.9 billion) every year for the next four
years,' he said."
In a rather more circumspect statement the Australian
Academy of Science expressed disappointment. "Professor Michael Barber, Secretary (Science Policy), said, 'This Budget has missed an opportunity to
ramp up the message of "new economy" because the chance to kick-start universities has been ignored.
Of major concern is the continuing erosion of science capacity as universities are forced to switch to
courses that are cheap to deliver.' ...Given half the chance, Australian scientists and technologists can deliver on wealth generation for the
nation. It is too bad that only about $160 million of the $3 billion expected over five years for Backing
Australia's Ability has been delivered this year."
A$770 Million to Stanford (May 28, 2001)
Currently Stanford's endowment is in the neighbourhood of
A$15 billion. Nevertheless earlier this month Walter Hewlett son of the late
cofounder of Hewlett-Packard, William Hewlett and chairman of the William and
Flora Hewlett Foundation announced that, "it became clear to me that
if something wasn't done to put [Stanford's School of Humanities and Sciences]
on a more firm financial footing, there would be a major deterioration." Of
the US$400 million donated to the university, US$300 million will go to the
School, while the remaining US$100 million is earmarked to assist in
undergraduate teaching.
Oxford and Princeton Increase Collaboration (May 28, 2001)
In a recent announcement the universities of Oxford and
Princeton set out plans to increase faculty and student exchanges as well as
access to research facilities. Twelve initial collaborative projects were
specifically mentioned, which included research into astrophysics,
biotechnology, genomics, material science and nanotechnology. Clearly this is
the way of the future and it's to be hoped that Australia's major research
universities will show similar initiatives, but to do so our institutions will
have to be in a position to bring something of significance to the table.
Science, Parliamentarians and Hot Pasta (May 28, 2001)
Robert May, Australian expatriate, president of the Royal
Society, London and immediate past U.K. Chief Scientist was invited by Science
to write its May 11th editorial. In it he quotes some interesting
statistics based on a recent poll in the United Kingdom. "84% of Britons
think that 'scientists and engineers make a valuable contribution to society'
and 68% think that 'scientists want to make life better for the average person.'
but the real issue, as the same poll showed, is that roughly 50% thought that
the pace of current scientific advance was too fast for government to keep up
with through effective oversight and regulation." Professor May goes on to
emphasise the necessity for developing effective means for dialogue among scientists,
government and the public while agreeing that this is easier said than done.
In all probability the figures quoted by Robert May would be
similar in Australia. Surely this is reason enough for our engineers and
scientists to form consensus with the major political parties to bring the
importance of science, science education and its fostering to the fore as an
national issue of paramount importance. The current slanging match between the Coalition
and Labor regarding who will increase taxes who won't and who is
"slithering" around the subject does no one credit and implies that
Australian voters think of nothing but their wallets. If like Britons, two of
every three Australians believe that "scientists want to make a better life
for the average person", is it out over the question that they would
believe that they deserve adequate support for doing their jobs. One thing is
certain, it ain't happening now.
Oh, and about the hot pasta - The Frankfurter
Allgemeine Zeitung pointed out in a recent article that the International
Atomic Energy Agency has 2252 plant breeds in its database that were genetically
modified (mutated) in the 1970s and '80s using high energy radiation, a
mechanism discovered by Herman Muller in the 1920's, and for which he received
the Nobel Prize. Durum wheat, from which the flour for pasta is obtained, is one
of the plants that has been usefully so modified. Some of Italy's
parliamentarians, including the outgoing Minister of Agriculture interpreted
this as impugning Italian spaghetti by implying that it was radioactive.
The British public appear to have a point - parliamentarians
seem to have trouble understanding science - and there is no reason to believe
that Italian representatives are any more ill informed than British or Australian
parliamentarians.
$22.5 Billion for Infrastructure and R&D This Year. (May 26, 2001)
No that's not what our Federal Government is allocating this
year, and no it's not even the whole estimated allocation from all Australian
sources this year.
"Although some analysts have repeatedly speculated that the downturn will
force Intel to cut back its plans to spend [US]$7.5 billion on capital expenditures and
[US]$4.2 billion on R&D this year, [CEO Craig] Barrett reaffirmed those plans, repeating a line
that has become something of a mantra in his speeches since the slump set in: 'The only way out of a slowdown is with new products and new
technology.' " So reports Henry Norr in today's San
Francisco Chronicle. At US$0.52 to the Australian Dollar Intel will
allocate 2.5 times Australia's total estimated investment for the coming
year. Nevertheless, according to the Government Budget papers, "[The] Major National Research Facilities
(MNRF) Program is directed at keeping Australia at the leading edge of scientific and technological
developments [emphasis ours]. Under the Program, funding is provided for facilities in a range of key scientific fields
where the establishment costs are beyond the capacity of any individual Australian institution. These
facilities create centres of capability for pursuing research with state-of-the-art equipment."
Total expenditure for 2001-2002? A$3.5 million.
Whom are they kidding?
The 2001/02 Science and Technology Budget - No Systems Go. (May 24, 2001)
The 2001
budget papers for science and technology are available on line. They need
critical appraisal because as always in such matters, the devil is in the
detail. In essence the Government has "locked in" its
promise of
about an additional $155 million which was foreshadowed in the unveiling of its
Innovation Action Plan on January 29th. It also allocates some $86
million for an the upgrade to the Lucas Heights nuclear reactor facility, a
debatable imperative at best. Put simply, the government has turned a deaf ear
to pleas for meaningful support for science and education. The budget does
nothing to assuage the disquiet voiced by the Scientific community both within
and outside the universities once the detail of the Innovation Action Plan had
begun to be critically analysed. At best we remain stagnant while our OECD
cohort continues to advance. Peter Pockley, frequent commentator on
Australian R&D for the British scientific journal Nature, put his
views cogently in Yesterday's Australian,
"Research slips from government's sights ...After a short burst in January, the sector has dropped off the government's priorities in favour of
recovery of votes. The Budget is a tacit declaration by the Coalition that it sees
no electoral imperative in a real kick-start to the nation's capacity to catch up
with competitors in innovation through universities and research." Dr. Pockley continues coming very close to wondering if its university R&D
estimates is done with smoke and mirrors but with the caveat that , "the full S&T Budget Statement is being withheld until nearly 24 hours
after the Budget (after this report was filed) and warrants closer examination of
the detail before setting a considered judgement of the overall position in stone."
That statement is now available (see above) and should do little to lessen his
disquiet.
Those views will be known and echoed throughout the
world's scientific community within the week. How much real incentive is
there for our expatriate scientists to return? Where is the encouragement for the
gifted of our younger generation to go into research and development?
A Robust Knowledge Infrastructure Must have Bipartisan Support. (May 22,
2001)
The Federal Labor opposition is carefully orchestrating
the promulgation of its "Knowledge Nation" Policy. Just over a month
ago Michelle Grattan reported that Barry
Jones as head of the Labor Taskforce for the Knowledge Nation had delivered its
draft report to Kim Beazley. Now comes an article in the May 19th Weekend
Australian by Paul Kelly, "Knowledge
Nation is a road to Damascus shift in traditional ALP thinking",
announcing that the report is now finalised and that Barry Jones will be
"dispatched to sell [it] around Australia." Kelly goes to quote Mr
Jones extensively who makes the points that, "We have to overcome the
crippling mind-set which repeats the mantra: `But Australia is only a small
economy.' Tell that to the Swedes, the Dutch, the Finns and the Israelis... You
can't just have a quick fix [for the schools, universities, research institutes
and corporations]... It's much too serious and it is very complicated... You have
to think in terms of decades."
A Government must face an election after no more than three
years in office. That being the case, surely at the very least a rapprochement
between the major political parties must be found, and a consensus cogently presented
to all Australians. Our parliamentary representatives owe those who place them
into office that much. Without it the political bickering, posturing and
ineffectual tinkering will continue ad nauseam at the Nation's grim cost.
The Year of the Volunteer. (May 20, 2001)
Aban Contractor's feature in Thursday's Sydney Morning Herald
was headed, "More
students, less money, ... go figure" The thrust of the article is
yet again that the universities are being cut to the bone. For a number of years
part-time teachers have been employed in order to maintain courses at minimum
cost. The ultimate is represented by an August 1996 letter sent by the School of
Dentistry at The University of Sydney, when, "part-time teachers... received a two-page letter from their dean asking them to work for
free. It cited the new Howard Government's determination to cut the current account deficit and the need for the university to address its own debts.
'As a result, I am writing to invite you to continue supporting your faculty by providing part-time teaching as you have done in the past, but without a fee for
service.' " Matters have not been improving.
On the other side of the issue Dr. Kemp, the minister charged
with Education, Training and Youth Affairs, insists that the universities have
never been better funded. But the fact of the matter is that since the Fraser
Government both Labor and the Coalition have looked to minimise Federal
Government expenditure, essentially telling the universities to go drum up
business and become more cost effective. It's an excellent way to cheapen the
product and that's just what's happening. Mind you under first Amanda Vanstone
and then David Kemp the Coalition has done the more effective hatchet job, but
were Labor to form the next Government serious reconstructing of tertiary
education is no certainty. If Mr. Beazley is serious about the "Knowledge
Nation", he'll have some selling to do to get sufficient of the Labor
caucus to back it meaningfully.
From the viewpoint of academics and senior "academic
management" some effective lobbying of both government and the
Australian people will be needed, and it is past time that it's realised that it
is not going to be done for them.
Every Country has Its Price. (May 20, 2001)
President George W. Bush has sent senior diplomats to key
countries, including Australia, to obtain backing for his missile shield. Next
month he will meet the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, in Slovenia to try and
persuade him to come on board. After all Russia just got US$20 million from
Dennis Tito for going into space as super cargo. Properly handled this could be
portrayed as a deposit. Canada's National Post has reported that Bush's
SWII would mean several hundred million dollars in contracts for advanced
equipment to be built in Canada. It's perhaps the ultimate in Keynesian economics,
someone else's government pays you to make things that no one in your country
has to buy. Whether it is of any value or not is of no consequence. Now rumour
has it that this approach was used successfully by Ronald Regan to get Margaret Thatcher
on side seventeen years ago and Russia is in far greater need for a substantial
cash injection than Thatcher's Britain was in 1984. Come to think of it
Australia might get a piece of the action if it handles matters adroitly.
Australian Astronomy Centre Stage. (May 19, 2001)
In a March
18th News And Views TFW referred to an interim report on
work done using the 150 inch Anglo-Australian Telescope at Siding Spring near Coonabarabran,
N.S.W. which has significantly extended our understanding of that birth and
nature of our universe. This past week, the work was reported by the New York
Times under the header "Scientists Detect the Traces of the Seeds of Cosmic
Structures" The findings of the 2dF survey, which were presented a
fortnight ago at a scientific conference were made available to scientists around the world
this past Wednesday. They emerged from the largest and most detailed mapping of galaxies ever made. Dr. Carlos Frenk, an astrophysicist at the University of Durham in Britain and a
member of the 2dF team, said the importance of the findings were to be found in the
grand perspective they provided. Dr. Joshua Frieman, an organiser of the
conference, said they will be followed on by "a much larger survey now in progress, called the Sloan
Digital Sky Survey and involving the United States, Germany and Japan. It would among
other things determine about a million galaxy positions [as compared to the
2dF's 170,000] over the next several years. The initial finding by the 2dF team suggested that the Sloan survey would be
able to... probe the overall contents of the universe."
The 2dF study involved 28 astronomers and cosmologists, 12 of whom are Australian
connected. Nevertheless the Australian Government has been less than generous in
its funding of Australian astronomy despite its outstanding contributions to the
science. What will happen in next week's budget remains to be seen.
Stop Bitching and Just Get On With It. (May 10, 2001)
The header for Margo Kingston's article in this morning's Sydney
Morning Herald might have read Batterham Bashes Scientists, but it
was far more genteel and stated simply Scientists 'must help themselves' with funds.
In a speech given yesterday to the National Press Club
Australia's Chief Scientist, Dr.
Robin Batterham, maintained it is "up to the science community to show what they can do"
with what it's been given and implied it ought to be grateful for the increase in
resources provided in the Government's Innovation Action Plan. One might be
forgiven for thinking that the Prime Minister's Office may have had a hand in
the tenor of Dr. Batterham's address. Certainly it would have been well received
by the PM. Chelsey Martin in the Australian Financial Review quotes the Chief
Scientist, "I think it is up to the community that we've got now of scientists, engineers and technologists to show what they can do, to show
what changes they can make in our performance with the very significant package that has been tabled and earn the trust and
groundswell of support to go on from there." It is
beyond credulity that the former Chief Scientist for the UK and recently elected
President of the Royal Society, Australian Robert May, would have countenanced
such a devastating and counterproductive observation. He went on coming as close
as maybe to relegating Australian basic research to the dust bin. Most assuredly
with an advocate such as Dr. Batterham Australian science doesn't require foes.
Perhaps he might like to view the graphic provided last month by Gavin Brown,
Vice-Chancellor of Sydney University, when he addressed the NPC and then repeat his contumely. Compared to
the OECD average our support for research and development is woeful and
assuredly we shall reap our economic decline for it.
Did
Reg Really Say That?
(May
10, 2001)
The ABC's 7:30 Report of May 9th focused on
the Federation Centenary and of course politics. Fran Kelly, the Report's soft
spoken political correspondent, made the observation, "...even as the
policy differences [between Labor and the Coalition have] narrowed, the
hostility between the two sides in Parliament has become, if anything, more
vicious than ever. ...That's turning voters off too." At which point the
old Liberal "Toe Cutter" and Frazer Minister, Reg Withers made the
observation, "The debate has disappeared out of the Parliament. Question
time is a farce. Ministerial statements are no longer made. Government policy is
never announced at Parliament. Parliament has become an irrelevance."
In short Australia is ruled by Cabinet. The tight reign placed on parliamentarians by their parties assures and perpetuates what has increasing become and oligarchical system. Labor is no different from the Coalition. It would be interesting to see if Australians would regain a respect for our Parliament and Parliamentarians were Members allowed increased latitude in casting their votes. That's one of the significant differences between the major parties on the one hand and the Australian Democrats on the other. In that respect the Democrats are more comparable to the U.S. Republican and Democratic Parties.
The effect on the interaction between the Cabinet Oligarchy and MHR backbenchers - of both parties - would certainly alter the responsiveness and character of governments. Obviously that latitude would need to extend to both sides of the House and Senate for the change to take place, and of course the threat of expulsion for crossing the floor would require mitigation.
Dumb idea - it'd never be allowed by the party
powerbrokers.
The Department of Defence, The Senate and The National Tertiary Education Union
(May 9, 2001)
TFW's editorial of April 13th asked, "Australia's Public Universities - Are They Good Enough?"
and referred to the Senate's Public inquiry into "The capacity of public universities to meet Australia's higher education needs."
The Inquiry is in the news again, due principally to Australia's defence forces
who last week informed the Committee that university students the Department
sponsors have complained of the quality of both facilities and teaching.
Thirty-seven of the nations 38 public universities have DoD sponsored scholars.
It pointed out that the universities from its viewpoint were strategic assets
and, "contribute significantly to the development of Defence
capability."
The NTEU,
clearly pleased at having an unexpected ally, has strongly supported the
DoD's submission and has urged the Minister of Defence, Peter Reith, to support
increases of 20% to the Government's student base funding. It would be
interesting to know whether or not Mr. Reith made any representations during the
Cabinet's final budget deliberations this week.
So far there have been representations from industry,
academe, and now the defence forces that there are serious deficiencies in our tertiary
education system. And these have come since the January 29th announcement
of the Government's Innovation
Action Plan. Whether or not
Senator
Tierney, who is Committee Chairman, still believes that the system is not in
crisis remains to be seen.
A final note: as of April 13 the Committee's Web site listed
73 submissions of which 54 could be scrutinised; as of today it lists
97, 85 of which can be read. In all some 300 submissions were put in,
including that from the Department of Defence. It is not among those
listed.
Princeton's New President - Molecular Biologist Shirley Tilghman (May 9,
2001)
For a double first Princeton University has chosen a
molecular biologist, Shirley Tilghman, to take up its
presidency on June 15th.
At the press conference held immediately following the announcement, Tilghman,
Head of Princeton's Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, and
noted for her studies on the mechanisms of gene activation and deactivation
indicated that she has every intention of treating the sciences and humanities even
handedly
and went on to emphasise that teaching must be coupled with inculcating an
active search for knowledge. One of the points that came out at the press
conference was Princeton's across the board undertaking that it would
open its doors to every talented student, "irrespective of the
ability to pay." No set number of scholarships, instead an open-handed commitment by
this private university seen by many as a refuge for "silver
tails".
Isn't it about time that the Group of Eight behave
comparably. Isn't it more than time that those parliamentarians, and the leader
of the Opposition in particular, who profess
support for the right of every Australian to an education commensurate with his
or her ability, to replace rhetoric with practice?
It's a Mad World. (May 6, 2001)
Bob Park is the American Physical Society's Washington Representative.
Following are his
observations for this past week in full. Clearly he's spitting chips, but
certainly the US' energy moguls and defence contractors should be popping Champaign
corks. Our Foreign Minister's fulsome support for SW II ought to be viewed in
the light of the physics of reality as well as political expediency. Perhaps the
Chief Scientist has already had at least a quiet chat with him.
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 4 May 01 Washington, DC
1. SCIENCE POLICY: THE WEEKLY DISASTER REPORT. The science
community seemed to lapse into a sullen silence after the Bush
administration announced missile and energy initiatives that
would have led to cries of outrage in the past. There is still
no White House Science Advisor. Anyone chosen now will
presumably support these new policies; that's unlikely to make
the science community happy.
2. ENERGY: VICE-PRESIDENT CHENEY ANNOUNCES ENERGY STRATEGY. What
would you expect two Texas oilmen to come up with? Exactly. The
Vice-President, speaking in Toronto on Monday, explained that
energy policy will emphasize production. Oh, conservation may be
"a personal virtue," he said, but it won't solve the problem:
"Americans demand more energy." So clean coal technology,
drilling in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, and even
nuclear energy, are part of the strategy, but there will be no
talk of renewables or efforts to reduce reliance on SUVs. By the
end of the week, however, conservation made a weak comeback. The
President yesterday directed Federal agencies in California to
reduce energy consumption. Conservation, it seems, is quick. [And read the NYT report]
3. STAR WARS II: PRESIDENT CALLS FOR A GLOBAL MISSILE SHIELD.
And he wants it in space, in the air, at sea and on land. The
threat of attack by third world crazies was cited as creating an
urgent need for such a defense. Let's see, we have spent $100B
or so already to develop such a system. What we learned is that,
if the enemy will put homing beacons on their missiles, we might
stop one out of three. But an Administration spokesman explained
that the defense doesn't really have to work, it only has to
create uncertainty. Well, it certainly does that. Even if it
could be made to work, it would only guarantee that a different
delivery system, such as a Ryder Rental truck, would be used
4. LOW NOTE: KEYNOTE SPEAKER LEAVES AAAS MEETING IN A HURRY.
Larry Lindsey, Economic Policy Advisor to the President, was the
Keynote speaker at the AAAS Science Policy Meeting. He warned
that the Kyoto protocol could damage our collective prosperity
and does little to promote development of new energy technology.
But of course, it was the Administration that slashed the
renewables and energy efficiency budgets by 50%. Lindsey left
hurriedly following his talk, without taking questions.
5. NASA SURVIVORS: HAS GOLDIN BEEN VOTED OFF THE ISLAND? It is
rumored that the White House has hired a headhunter to find a
replacement for Dan Goldin as NASA Administrator. Goldin is the
only high-level survivor of the last Republican Administration.
Meanwhile, high-tech bungee jumper Dennis Tito's stomach problems
have hogged the news all week, making one wonder if too much
disposable income isn't becoming a problem.
THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY (Note: Opinions are the author's,
and are not necessarily shared by the APS, but they should be.)
It's What Makes the Web Profound (May 3, 2001)
Paul Ginsparg, the Los Alamos theoretical physicist, founded the archive 10
years ago. To say that its affect on physical research has been profound borders on gross understatement. Leaders in arcane research areas such as super
symmetry, quantum cosmology as well as more accessible subjects such as medical
physics or physics education, to name but a very few, log in daily to check out
what's new. Perhaps of greatest value has been its affect on research in the
less developed nations, but at 2 million hits a week, workers in all corners of
the Web enabled world keep up with and contribute to the most recent
advances via arXiv.org. Make no mistake this
is a website for the cognoscenti, but a May 1st feature article in
the New
York Times gives a good indication of the far reach of Ginparg's 1991
initiative.