News & Views item - December  2012

 

 

Practical Benefits from Fundamental Research. (December 3, 2012)

The US President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) at the end of last month released its report on Transformation and Opportunity: The Future of the U.S. Research Enterprise

 

John Holdren and Eric Lander, PCAST's Co-chairs introduce the report: ...The Nation once led the world in investments in research and development (R&D) as a share of gross domestic product (GDP), but more recently, the United States has been investing less in R&D than other leading and emerging nations invest. Moreover, U.S. industry has been shifting its investments toward applied R&D, narrowing the support for basic and early-stage applied research, which is crucial to transforming innovation... This report therefore addresses the two objectives of (1) enhancing long-range U.S. investment in basic and early-stage applied research and (2) reducing the barriers to the transformation of the results of that research into new products, industries, and jobs. In this report, PCAST describes a series of specific opportunities for the Federal Government, universities, and industry to strengthen the U.S. research enterprise.

   Among the actions that PCAST recommends, three stand out in scope and importance: (1) that you reaffirm your stated goal that U.S. total R&D expenditures (across the public and private sectors) should achieve and sustain a level of 3 percent of GDP; (2) that actions be taken, some achievable entirely by Executive decision, to increase the stability and predictability of Federal research funding; and (3) that Congress not only make the R&D tax credit permanent, but increase it to at least 17 percent, as you have already advocated.

 

Below is the introductory apologia for public support for fundamental research by the federal government of United States, and the report as a whole allows an interesting comparison with that of the recently released Australian Government's 2012 National Research Investment Plan.

_____________________________________

 

Practical results that are built on Federally supported fundamental research are virtually everywhere in use. Fundamental break-throughs can be ascribed to the support of many Federal agencies, including National Science Foundation (NSF),a Department of Energy (DOE),b National Institutes of Health (NIH),c National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA),d U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA),e and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).f While the following examples only scratch the surface, it is worth contemplating how different the world would be without each of these practical benefits of fundamental research. What would today’s world be like without the Internet, modern drugs, computers, wireless telecommunication, passenger jet aircraft, weather satellites, GPS, digital cameras, or the knowledge of the human genome? The question is fanciful because of the Nation’s consistent support of fundamental research over the last 60 years. Less fanciful, and subject to legislative and executive decisions, is the question, “What about the next 60 years?”

____________________________________

 

References:

a "NSF Sensational 60" at www.nsf.gov/about/history/sensational60.pdf.

b DOE, "Technology Transfer Program Successes" at techtransfer.energy.gov/success/techtranstories.pdf

c "NIH Technologies in the Development of Healthcare Products" at /www.ott.nih.gov/pdfs/techdev.pdf.

d NASA Office of the Chief Technologist, "Success Stories" at www.nasa.gov/offices/oct/success/index.html.

e USDA Agricultural Research Service, "Technologies in the Marketplace" at www.ars.usda.gov/business/docs.htm?docid=769.

f NOAA, Office of Research and Technology Applications at www.oar.noaa.gov/orta/.